LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name † | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
(1961) 2 SCJ 372 |
|
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | circa 1961 |
|
||
Another v Smt S Sindhu |
|
circa 2006 |
|
||||
Associated Cement Co Ltd v Commercial Tax Officer, Kota |
[1981] INSC 156; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 2 Sep 1981 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Atherton West & Co Ltd v Suti Mill Mazdoor Union |
[1953] INSC 22; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 16 Mar 1953 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Bengal Nagpur Railway Co Ltd v Ruttanji Ramji |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1938 |
|
||
Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co Ltd v Commissioner of Income Tax |
[1986] INSC 134; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 15 Jul 1986 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh v M Chandra Sekhar |
[1984] INSC 228; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 4 Dec 1984 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Conductors Pvt Ltd v Assam State Electricity Board & Another |
|
circa 2012 |
|
||||
Eastern Coalfields Ltd v MP |
|
circa 2003 |
|
||||
Gursahai Saigal v Commissioner of Income-Tax, Punjab |
[1962] INSC 249; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 31 Aug 1962 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
India Carbon Ltd v Assam |
|
circa 1997 |
|
||||
India United Mills Ltd v Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Bombay |
[1954] INSC 102; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 28 Oct 1954 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India |
|
circa 2011 |
|
||||
JK Synthetics Ltd v Commercial Taxes Officer |
[1994] INSC 298; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 9 May 1994 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Mahabir Prashad Rungta v Durga Datt |
[1961] INSC 28; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 31 Jan 1961 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Mahairam Kamjidas's(1)case ','makes the machinery workable, utres valeat potius quam pereat" We, therefore, think that we should read sub-sec (6), according to the provision of which interest has to be calculated as provided in sub-sec (8) in a manner which makes it workable and thereby prevent the clear intention of sub-sec (8) being defeated Now, how is that best done? As we have (1) |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1940 |
|
||
Maine and New Brunswick Electrical Power Co v Hart |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1929 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd v Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board |
|
circa 2011 |
|
||||
Prabhavati Ramgarib B v Divisional Railway Manager | (2010) 4 Maharashtra Law Journal 691 | Maharashtra Law Journal | India - Maharashtra | circa 2010 |
|
||
Raghunath Rai Bareja v Punjab National Bank |
|
circa 2007 |
|
||||
Satinder Singh v Amrao Singh |
[1961] INSC 31; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 2 Feb 1961 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Securities & Exchange Board of India |
|
circa 2004 |
|
||||
Sitaram v Wamurad |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1948 |
|
|||
Union of India & Another |
|
circa 2009 |
|
||||
Union of India v AL Rallia Ram |
[1963] INSC 108; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 19 Apr 1963 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Union of India v Tata Chemicals Ltd |
|
circa 2014 |
|
||||
Whitney v IRC |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1926 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
1 SCC 283 |
|
circa 1940 |
|
||||
1 SCR 810 |
|
circa 1940 |
|
||||
3 SCC 461 |
|
circa 1940 |
|
||||
3 SCR 164 |
|
circa 1940 |
|
||||
3 SCR 676 |
|
circa 1940 |
|
||||
3 SCR 893 |
|
circa 1940 |
|
||||
4 SCC 578 |
|
circa 1940 |
|
||||
67 CLJ 153 |
|
circa 1940 |
|