Cases Referring to this Journal Article | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

1 Equitable Lawyer 5 3

1 Equitable Lawyer 5

Equitable Lawyer

United Kingdom

Cases Referring to this Journal Article

Case Name	Citation(s) †	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Interpretación prejudicial del art culo 22 de la Decisión 344 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena, solicitada por el Consejo de Estado de la República de Colombia, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Primera. Interpretación de oficio de los art culos 13 literal d) y 21 de la misma Decisión. Actor: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY Patente: "BATERIA CON CONTROLADOR INCORPORADO" (PROCESO Nº 106-IP-2002)		Court of Justice of the Andean Community	International	4 Dec 2002	WorldLII
Gray v Sidneff	[1803] EngR 598; 127 ER 216; (1803) 3 Bos & P 395	Court of Common Pleas	United Kingdom	circa 1803	CommonLII		1
Sharpe v Iffgrave	[1803] EngR 587; 127 ER 215; (1803) 3 Bos & P 394	Court of Common Pleas	United Kingdom	circa 1803	CommonLII		2

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback