LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

" It can be seen to be highly desirable that the judicial administration of the day to day working of the cross-vesting scheme is not encumbered by an encrustation of judge-made pronouncements of principles to be applied when considering making a transfer order It calls for what I might describe as a `nuts and bolts' management decision as to which court, in the pursuit of the interests of justice, is the more appropriate to hear and determine the substantive dispute Consideration of textured principle and deep learning - in particular principles of international law such as forum non conveniens - have no place in a cross-vesting adjudication "   flag  1

14 NSWLR 714E
New South Wales Law Reports
Australia - New South Wales

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd v Zunic [2001] NSWSC 561; (2001) 22 NSWCCR 92; (2001) 122 IR 170 Supreme Court of New South Wales Australia - New South Wales 5 Jul 2001 AustLII flag 16

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback