LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

" It can be seen to be highly desirable that the judicial administration of the day to day working of the cross-vesting scheme is not encumbered by an encrustation of judge-made pronouncements of principles to be applied when considering making a transfer order It calls for what I might describe as a `nuts and bolts' management decision as to which court, in the pursuit of the interests of justice, is the more appropriate to hear and determine the substantive dispute Consideration of textured principle and deep learning - in particular principles of international law such as forum non conveniens - have no place in a cross-vesting adjudication "     1

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court †	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd v Zunic	[2001] NSWSC 561; (2001) 22 NSWCCR 92; (2001) 122 IR 170	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	5 Jul 2001	AustLII		16