see Feldman v Bomar     2

" 43 USC § 1601(b), a resolution of the disputed claims in this case Nearly thirty years have now passed since the enactment of ANILCA and it is time to bring this litiga- tion to an end We hold that § 1427 ratified the eligibility determination that Stratman seeks to challenge, leaving us unable to grant Stratman's requested relief under ANCSA regardless of the merits of his claims Because we lack juris- diction to hear moot claims