LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Munshi-- for Appel United "Refineries {Burma) Ltd and lant others--Respondents, Young and Pandit--for Respondents First Appeal No 53 of 1932, Decided Page G J --This appeal must be dis on 23rd January 1933, against judgment missed Although I am not able to ac of Dist Judge, Hanthawaddy, D/- 11th cept in toto the grounds either in law March 1932 or in fact upon which the order of the (a) Civil P C (1908), O 21, R 22--No District Court was based, I am of opin notice, no jurisdiction to sell property A notice under 0 21, R 22 is necessary in ion that the order dismissing the appel order that the Court should obtain jurisdiction lant's application was correct, and must to sell property by way of execution as against be confirmed The appellant applied the legal representative of a deceased judgment- under S 47, Civil P C to the District debtor A sale held in the course of execution proceedings without the issue of a notice to the Court of Hanthawaddy for an order that legal representative of a party in a case in which the execution proceedings in Civil Execu O 21, R 22, applies is irregular and inopera tion No 30 of 1931 and the sale of a tive as against such legal representative: 20 refinery held in the course of the said Cal 370, Foil     1

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction †	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
U Sein v Ma Bok	[1933] AllINRprRang 25	All India Reporter - Rangoon	Myanmar	2 Feb 1933	AsianLII