|
Ram Parshad v Indian Institute of Bankers
|
AIR 1992 P & H 1
|
|
India - Punjab
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
 1
|
|
Air 1992 P & H 8
|
AIR 1992 P & H 8
|
|
India - Punjab
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
1
|
|
Air 1992 P & H 95
|
AIR 1992 P & H 95
|
|
India - Punjab
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
1
|
|
Tjinder Singh Sidhu v State
|
AIR 1992 P & H 119
|
|
India - Punjab
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
1
|
|
Writing "NA" only shows that the respondent had not taken loan from any bank or any financial institution and giving of such names was not applicable and he had not to El Pet No 15/2009 Mr Sushil Choudhery v Mr Neeraj Basoya Page 5 of 7 pay government dues of any department I, therefore consider that contention of the petitioner that the affidavit was not properly filled is baseless contention 7 The other issue raised by the petitioner is that the affidavit was ,,attested by Notary Public and the affidavit was not sworn before him He submitted that affidavit was required to be sworn before the Notary Public and since affidavit was not sworn before the Notary Public and it was only attested by the Notary Public, it was
|
|
|
India - Punjab
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
1
|
|
Air 1992 P & H 183
|
AIR 1992 P & H 183
|
|
India - Punjab
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
1
|
|
Air 1992 P & H 252
|
AIR 1992 P & H 252
|
|
India - Punjab
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
|
