Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Annexure 'A' subject to the condition that the claim of the petitioner shall be considered with effect from the date persons junior to him were promoted As a matter of abundant caution, we consider it just and proper to require the respondent to examine the claim of the petitioner in terms of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Union of India v K Krishnan 3

AIR 1992 SC 1898

All India Reporter, Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India

India

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
Mrs Darshana Momaya Dabral (Staff No 83022) Director (Accounts-I) v Secretary Department of Telecommunications Ministry of Communication and IT - Case	[2007] INCAT 925	Indian Central Administrative Tribunal	India	3 Jul 2007	LIIofIndia
Harish Kumar Gupta v Haryana - CWP-17252-2006	[2006] INPBHC 1429	High Court of Punjab and Haryana	India	6 Mar 2006	LIIofIndia
Rajbir Singh v Government of India - CWP-2443-2006	[2006] INPBHC 1431	High Court of Punjab and Haryana	India	6 Mar 2006	LIIofIndia

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback