LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Patrick Francis Gahan, Duncan Ferguson, and Charles Henry Cox,-Appellants; Marie Gabriel Lafitte,-Respondent   flag  13

[1842] EngR 862; (1842) 13 ER 155; (1841-42) 3 Moore PC 382
Privy Council
United Kingdom

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index † 
Henry Edmund Taaffe, Esq v The Right Hon William Downes [1840] EngR 402; 13 ER 15; (1840) 3 Moore PC 36 Privy Council United Kingdom circa 1840 CommonLII flag 14
John Gore -Appellants; James Gardiner and Alexander Urquhart,-Respondents [1840] EngR 404; 3 Moore PC 79; 13 ER 37 Privy Council United Kingdom circa 1840 CommonLII flag 2
[1991] Hkcfi 112 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 112 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 114 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 114 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 116 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 116 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
Re Chiu Te-Ken, Deacon [1991] HKCFI 326 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 105 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 105 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 106 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 106 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 107 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 107 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
Chiu Tat-Cheong, David v Habeas Corpus Ad Subjiciendum [1991] HKCFI 327 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
John Calder,-Appellant; Robert Craigie Halket,-Respondent [1840] EngR 783; 18 ER 311 United Kingdom circa 1840 CommonLII flag
Rajah Gopal Inder Narain Roy,-Appellant; Rajah Jagarnath Gurg,-Respondent; in the matter of the Petition of Rajah Gopal Inder Narain, security in the cause wherein Rajah Mootee Lal Opudhiya was Plaintiff, and Motee Hura, the step-mother of Rajah Jagarnath Gurg, was Defendant [1839] EngR 1187; 18 ER 318 United Kingdom circa 1839 CommonLII flag

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title Citation(s) Author Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index † 
"Unconstitutional Statutes and De Facto Officers" (1966) 2 Federal Law Review 37 Pannam, C L Australia circa 1966 AustLII flag 8

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index † 
[1991] Hkcfi 114 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 114 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 112 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 112 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
Re Chiu Te-Ken, Deacon [1991] HKCFI 326 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 107 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 107 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 106 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 106 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 116 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 116 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 105 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 105 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
John Calder,-Appellant; Robert Craigie Halket,-Respondent [1840] EngR 783; 18 ER 311 United Kingdom circa 1840 CommonLII flag
Rajah Gopal Inder Narain Roy,-Appellant; Rajah Jagarnath Gurg,-Respondent; in the matter of the Petition of Rajah Gopal Inder Narain, security in the cause wherein Rajah Mootee Lal Opudhiya was Plaintiff, and Motee Hura, the step-mother of Rajah Jagarnath Gurg, was Defendant [1839] EngR 1187; 18 ER 318 United Kingdom circa 1839 CommonLII flag

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback