LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Patrick Francis Gahan, Duncan Ferguson, and Charles Henry Cox,-Appellants; Marie Gabriel Lafitte,-Respondent   flag  13

[1842] EngR 862; (1842) 13 ER 155; (1841-42) 3 Moore PC 382
Privy Council
United Kingdom

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
[1991] Hkcfi 105 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 105 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 106 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 106 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 107 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 107 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 112 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 112 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 114 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 114 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
[1991] Hkcfi 116 (22 April 1991) [1991] HKCFI 116 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
Re Chiu Te-Ken, Deacon [1991] HKCFI 326 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
Chiu Tat-Cheong, David v Habeas Corpus Ad Subjiciendum [1991] HKCFI 327 Hong Kong Court of First Instance Hong Kong 22 Apr 1991 HKLII flag
John Calder,-Appellant; Robert Craigie Halket,-Respondent [1840] EngR 783; 18 ER 311 United Kingdom circa 1840 CommonLII flag
Henry Edmund Taaffe, Esq v The Right Hon William Downes [1840] EngR 402; 13 ER 15; (1840) 3 Moore PC 36 Privy Council United Kingdom circa 1840 CommonLII flag 14
John Gore -Appellants; James Gardiner and Alexander Urquhart,-Respondents [1840] EngR 404; 3 Moore PC 79; 13 ER 37 Privy Council United Kingdom circa 1840 CommonLII flag 2
Rajah Gopal Inder Narain Roy,-Appellant; Rajah Jagarnath Gurg,-Respondent; in the matter of the Petition of Rajah Gopal Inder Narain, security in the cause wherein Rajah Mootee Lal Opudhiya was Plaintiff, and Motee Hura, the step-mother of Rajah Jagarnath Gurg, was Defendant [1839] EngR 1187; 18 ER 318 United Kingdom circa 1839 CommonLII flag

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title Citation(s) Author Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
"Unconstitutional Statutes and De Facto Officers" (1966) 2 Federal Law Review 37 Pannam, C L Australia circa 1966 AustLII flag 8

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Thomas Le Breton, Esquire,-Appellant; James Ennis,-Respondent [1844] EngR 216; 13 ER 328; (1844) 4 Moore PC 323 Privy Council United Kingdom circa 1844 CommonLII flag 2
Edward Cobb Morgan, Charles Augustus West, James Patch, John Pascal Larkings, Edward Armitage, and Henry Alderson Woodhouse,-Appellants; George William Leech,-Respondent (1841) 2 Moore Ind App 428 India 12 Feb 1841 LIIofIndia flag 4
John Bellingham Inglis,-Appellant; Charles de Barnard ,-Respondents [1841] EngR 859; 13 ER 172; (1841) 3 Moore PC 425 Privy Council United Kingdom circa 1841 CommonLII flag 3
Robert Stratton and Albert D'Alton-Appellants; James Symon,-Respondent [1838] EngR 438; 1837 2 Moore PC 125; 12 ER 951 Privy Council United Kingdom circa 1838 CommonLII flag 16
Mudhoosoodun Sundm1 v Surroop Churnder Sirkar Ghowdry 1849 4 Moore Ind App 433 India flag 2
Ha22 v Bigge 1841 3 Moore PC 453 Privy Council United Kingdom flag 2
Ex parte Robertson 8 St Tr NS 1070; (1857-58) 11Moo PC 293 United Kingdom flag 2
3 Moore PC 3973 3 Moore PC 3973 Privy Council United Kingdom flag 2
3 Moore PC 395 3 Moore PC 395 Privy Council United Kingdom flag 2

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback